ScienceDaily for November 15, 2009 reported on the accuracy of DNA dating.
"The observations in this report appear to be fundamental and should extend to most animal species," he added. "We believe that traditional DNA dating techniques are fundamentally flawed, and that the rates of evolution are in fact much faster than conventional technologies have led us to believe."
1 comments:
It Is Culture That Sets Evolution's Rate
It Is Genes That Evolve Expressions
Unbelievable! Evolution Rate Seems To Be "Species Specific"!
Quotes from "Penguin DNA evolving faster than thought"
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/49671/title/Penguin_DNA_evolving_faster_than_thought
- "One of the most basic assumptions is that the rate of evolution is the same in all species. Now, the new study provides evidence that, at least for Ad?lie penguins, evolution is happening faster than previously thought. This is a beautiful study. Some people have been saying this for a long time, but no one has shown this in such a systematic way.”
*** Unbelievable! These statements display a complete illiterate misunderstanding of the origin, nature and mechanism of evolution. Stated in a 21st century sciencenews article!
- "Comparing the DNA in modern birds to that in ancient generations shows molecular evolution happens at varying rates, and that each species has its own rate of evolution."
*** Unbelievable! What an exciting new discovery! An exhilarating find!
- "A study of DNA from ancient and modern Adelie penguins suggests that scientists may have miscalculated the rates at which genetic clocks tick off evolutionary time in other species as well"
*** "Genetic clocks tick off evolutionary time"! How poetically, dramatically, sophisticatedly scientific!
- "But each part of the circular mitochondrial genome evolves at different rates, the team found".
*** Realy? You don't say! Here are all these genes next to each other in the circular genome and the next thing you know someone might want to convince you that each of these genes is an organism, even if they are all interdependent in the genome. What d'you know!
- "“When you’re extrapolating one group's evolution rates to another group, there’s a very good chance it’s an underestimate,”
*** Sorry, mate. When you’re extrapolating one group's rates to another group, there’s a certainty it's an evolution illiteracy. Plain and simple.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321
Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/180/122.page#3108
Post a Comment