This is a parallel between science and religion that I hadn't thought of until I read a report about new genetic information disagreeing with the prevailing scientific view that races don't actually exist and are just social creations. That article triggered my mind to think about the Tower of Babel and the changing of the languages of the people.
First I'd like to talk about this issue from the religious viewpoint. Then I will talk about it from the scientific view.
Prior to the time of the Tower of Babel, all of the people spoke a common language and probably had common cultural customs. When the Lord changed their languages, he scattered them throughout "all the earth". I am not writing about the question whether that was all the planet as we think of it today or was just all of their known world, but people who have strong views about that question are invited to reply to this post and express their view. From the Biblical viewpoint, this was the beginning of ethnic languages and customs. Thus, we see that the people did have a common ancestry, and they did have common customs until they were were scattered.
Concerning the genetics of these people, there were eight people who left the ark and repopulated the earth. The three sons of Noah would have had genes in common with Noah but not completely identical to his genome. The three wives of Noah's sons would each have had their own genetic pool. Thus, we see that the grand children of Noah, and later generations, would have had some genes in common with Noah but other genes different than him. In addition, during the time between the flood and the building of the Tower of Babel, mutations to the genes could have occurred. I don't know much about genetics, and I don't know the likelihood of mutations occurring in a period of a few hundred years to perhaps a thousand years. In summary, the people living at the time of the Tower of Babel probably would have had a commonality in their genes plus variances due to ancestry and mutations.
So much for the religious view. Now, let's look at the scientific view. In recent years, many scientists have thought that genetically all people were the same and that there was no genetic basis for having different races. This is not to say that everyone had exactly the same genes but that the differences were not the bases for different races. This view was the basis of my post on We are 99.9% the same.
Recent research, however, has shown that there are genetic differences between races. One reason for this is that different races have different ancestries and thus different gene-pools. However, scientists are divided as to the magnitude of the genetic differences in races. Some scientists think "There is considerable structural variation in the human genome [genetic code], most of which was not previously apparent". Scientists at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute reported that "at least 10 percent of genes in the human population can vary in the number of copies of DNA sequences they contain". Other scientists, though, say the genetic differences are small. Stephen W. Scherer of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada said, "Taking all types of DNA variation into consideration and looking at the entire 'content' of the genome, I would now say we are 99.7 - 99.8 percent identical". In summary, there seems to be a genetic basis for believing that races are real, but the differences between the races may be relatively small.
Both the religious view and the scientific view give a basis for believing that the peoples of the earth do have a common ancestry of some type but that differences in language, customs, and genetic information have changed over time. This all makes sense to me.
When I first started thinking about the religious view giving Noah as the "father" of all persons living on the earth, I began to wonder if he lived far enough back to be the common ancestor of everyone. Genetic genealogists refer to this common ancestor as the MRCA, the most recent common ancestor, and they estimate that a MRCA would have lived approximately 2,000 years to 5,000 years ago, as I documented in What is a Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA)?. From the religious view, Noah would thus be our MRCA. That time-frame fits in with an estimated date of the Tower of Babel being approximately 3500 BC, and the flood being a few hundred years or so before that.
To parallel a point I made at the beginning of this blog, I am not asserting that science has proved that Noah was our MRCA. I am not saying that science has proved that God did change the language of the people and scatter them on the earth. I am merely showing that there is an interesting parallel between the scientific view of a common ancestor and the Biblical story of Noah and of his descendants who built the Tower of Babel.